Showing posts with label products. Show all posts
Showing posts with label products. Show all posts

RhOD immune globulin products for prevention of alloimmunization during pregnancy Society Logo Skip to main page content

HOME CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SUPPLEMENTS REPRINTS ALERTS KEYWORDS GO Advanced Search ? Advertisement
RhOD immune globulin products for prevention of alloimmunization during pregnancy Samuel L. Aitken and Eric M. Tichy?
Samuel L. Aitken, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist in Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Eric M. Tichy, Pharm.D., FCCP, BCPS, is Senior Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Solid Organ Transplantation, and Director, Postgraduate Year 2 Residency, Department of Pharmacy Services, Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT. Address correspondence to Dr. Tichy (eric.tichy{at}ynhh.org). Abstract Purpose The pharmacologic properties of Rhesus (Rh) immune globulin (RhIG) and clinical data on its effectiveness in preventing Rh-antigen alloimmunization in pregnant women are reviewed.

Summary RhIG is a human plasma derivative that targets red blood cells (RBCs) positive for RhO antigen (also called D antigen). In the United States and other countries, the widespread use of RhIG has markedly reduced the occurrence of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), a devastating condition caused by D-antigen sensitization of a pregnant woman via exposure to fetal RBCs (usually during detachment of the placenta in labor) that results in a maternal immune response leading to severe hemolysis in the fetus. Routine administration of RhIG at 26–30 weeks’ gestation and again within 72 hours of delivery has been shown to be highly effective in preventing maternal Rh alloimmunization, with very low rates of D-antigen sensitization (in the range of 0–2.2%) reported in multiple studies of at-risk women. The four RhIG products currently available in the United States have common clinical indications but differ in certain attributes. Pharmacists can play an important role in guiding other clinicians on the rationale for the use of RhIG, important differences between products, and appropriate timing of RhIG therapy.

Conclusion Routine administration of RhIG to women at risk for Rh alloimmunization is clinically effective and has made HDFN a rare clinical event. The available RhIG products are not the same and should be carefully reviewed to ensure that they are administered safely.

Copyright ? 2015 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. Add to CiteULikeCiteULike Add to DeliciousDelicious Add to DiggDigg Add to FacebookFacebook Add to Google+Google+ Add to RedditReddit Add to TwitterTwitter What's this?

? Previous | Next Article ? Table of Contents This Article doi: 10.2146/ajhp140288 American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy February 15, 2015 vol. 72 no. 4 267-276 ? Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Classifications Print Content Clinical Review Services Email this article to a colleague Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Alert me when eLetters are published Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager eLetters Submit an eLetter No eLetters published Citing Articles Load citing article information Google Scholar Articles by Aitken, S. L. Articles by Tichy, E. M. PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Aitken, S. L. Articles by Tichy, E. M. Related Content Load related web page information Social Bookmarking Add to CiteULikeCiteULike Add to DeliciousDelicious Add to DiggDigg Add to FacebookFacebook Add to Google+Google+ Add to RedditReddit Add to TwitterTwitter What's this?

Current Issue February 15, 2015, 72 (4) Current Issue Alert me to new issues of American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy From the Cover RhOD immune globulin products for prevention of alloimmunization during pregnancy Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to oral administration for solid organ transplant recipients Economic burden of recurrent venous thromboembolism: Analysis from a U.S. hospital perspective Comparative analytics of infusion pump data across multiple hospital systems ABOUT AJHP SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR AUTHORS/REVIEWERS PERMISSION REQUESTS ADVERTISING EMAIL ALERTS (FREE) Email Alerts (Free) RSS FEEDS (FREE) RSS Feeds (Free) HELP CONTACT US/FEEDBACK American Society of Health System Pharmacists Learning Center (CE) Store Meetings & Conferences ASHP Foundation MOST READ ARTICLES (Last 30 Days) Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: A consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists How to write a patient case report Treatment of poisoning caused by {beta}-adrenergic and calcium-channel blockers ? View all Most Read articles Advertisement ? 2015 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Terms of Use | Copyright Online ISSN: 1535-2900 Print ISSN: 1079-2082

View the original article here

Cost-utility analysis of botulinum toxin type A products for the treatment of cervical dystonia Society Logo Skip to main page content

HOME CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SUPPLEMENTS REPRINTS ALERTS KEYWORDS GO Advanced Search ? Advertisement
Cost-utility analysis of botulinum toxin type A products for the treatment of cervical dystonia Rashid Kazerooni? and Christine Broadhead
Rashid Kazerooni, Pharm.D., BCPS, is Pharmacoeconomics Program Manager, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA. Christine Broadhead, B.S.N., RN, is Critical Care Nurse, Sharp HealthCare, San Diego. Address correspondence to Dr. Kazerooni (rashidkazerooni{at}hotmail.com). Abstract Purpose A cost-utility analysis of botulinum toxin type A products for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD) was conducted.

Methods A cost-utility analysis of botulinum toxin type A products was conducted from the U.S. government perspective using a decision-analysis model with a one-year time horizon. Probabilities of the model were taken from several studies using the three botulinum type A products approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CD: onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox), abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport), and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin). The main outcome measurement was successful treatment response with botulinum toxin type A, measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Response was defined as a patient who experienced improvement of CD symptoms without a severe adverse event. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to test robustness of the base-case results.

Results All three botulinum toxin type A agents were cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY. Xeomin was the most cost-effective with a cost-effectiveness ratio of $27,548 per QALY. Xeomin was dominant over the alternative agents with equivalent efficacy outcomes and lower costs. Dysport had the second lowest cost-effectiveness ratio ($36,678), followed by Botox ($49,337). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported the results of the base-case analysis. Dysport was associated with the lowest wastage (2.2%), followed by Xeomin (10%) and Botox (22.9%).

Conclusion A cost-utility analysis found that Xeomin was the more cost-effective botulinum toxin type A product compared with Botox and Dysport for the treatment of CD. Wastage associated with the respective products may have a large effect on the cost-effectiveness of the agents.

Copyright ? 2015 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. Add to CiteULikeCiteULike Add to DeliciousDelicious Add to DiggDigg Add to FacebookFacebook Add to Google+Google+ Add to RedditReddit Add to TwitterTwitter What's this?

? Previous | Next Article ? Table of Contents This Article doi: 10.2146/ajhp140276 American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy February 15, 2015 vol. 72 no. 4 301-307 ? Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Classifications Print Content Notes Services Email this article to a colleague Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Alert me when eLetters are published Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager eLetters Submit an eLetter No eLetters published Citing Articles Load citing article information Google Scholar Articles by Kazerooni, R. Articles by Broadhead, C. PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Kazerooni, R. Articles by Broadhead, C. Related Content Load related web page information Social Bookmarking Add to CiteULikeCiteULike Add to DeliciousDelicious Add to DiggDigg Add to FacebookFacebook Add to Google+Google+ Add to RedditReddit Add to TwitterTwitter What's this?

Current Issue February 15, 2015, 72 (4) Current Issue Alert me to new issues of American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy From the Cover RhOD immune globulin products for prevention of alloimmunization during pregnancy Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to oral administration for solid organ transplant recipients Economic burden of recurrent venous thromboembolism: Analysis from a U.S. hospital perspective Comparative analytics of infusion pump data across multiple hospital systems ABOUT AJHP SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR AUTHORS/REVIEWERS PERMISSION REQUESTS ADVERTISING EMAIL ALERTS (FREE) Email Alerts (Free) RSS FEEDS (FREE) RSS Feeds (Free) HELP CONTACT US/FEEDBACK American Society of Health System Pharmacists Learning Center (CE) Store Meetings & Conferences ASHP Foundation MOST READ ARTICLES (Last 30 Days) Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: A consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists How to write a patient case report Treatment of poisoning caused by {beta}-adrenergic and calcium-channel blockers ? View all Most Read articles Advertisement ? 2015 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Terms of Use | Copyright Online ISSN: 1535-2900 Print ISSN: 1079-2082

View the original article here