Development of an inpatient operational pharmacy productivity model Society Logo Skip to main page content

HOME CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SUPPLEMENTS REPRINTS ALERTS KEYWORDS GO Advanced Search ? Advertisement
Development of an inpatient operational pharmacy productivity model Ryan W. Naseman?, Ben R. Lopez, Ryan A. Forrey, Robert J. Weber and Kris M. Kipp
Ryan W. Naseman, Pharm.D., M.S., is Assistant Director of Pharmacy and Infusion; Ben R. Lopez, Pharm.D., M.S., M.H.A., is Assistant Director of Pharmacy and Infusion; and Ryan A. Forrey, Pharm.D., M.S., is Associate Director of Pharmacy and Infusion, The Ohio State University (OSU) James Cancer Center and Solove Research Institute, Columbus. Robert J. Weber, Pharm.D., M.S., is Administrator, Pharmacy Services, OSU Wexner Medical Center, and Assistant Dean, OSU College of Pharmacy, Columbus. Kris M. Kipp, M.S.N., is Executive Director, Patient Services, and Chief Nursing Officer, OSU James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute. Address correspondence to Dr. Naseman (ryan.naseman{at}osumc.edu). Abstract Purpose An innovative model for measuring the operational productivity of medication order management in inpatient settings is described.

Methods Order verification within a computerized prescriber order-entry system was chosen as the pharmacy workload driver. To account for inherent variability in the tasks involved in processing different types of orders, pharmaceutical products were grouped by class, and each class was assigned a time standard, or “medication complexity weight” reflecting the intensity of pharmacist and technician activities (verification of drug indication, verification of appropriate dosing, adverse-event prevention and monitoring, medication preparation, product checking, product delivery, returns processing, nurse/provider education, and problem-order resolution). The resulting “weighted verifications” (WV) model allows productivity monitoring by job function (pharmacist versus technician) to guide hiring and staffing decisions. A 9-month historical sample of verified medication orders was analyzed using the WV model, and the calculations were compared with values derived from two established models—one based on the Case Mix Index (CMI) and the other based on the proprietary Pharmacy Intensity Score (PIS).

Results Evaluation of Pearson correlation coefficients indicated that values calculated using the WV model were highly correlated with those derived from the CMI-and PIS-based models (r = 0.845 and 0.886, respectively). Relative to the comparator models, the WV model offered the advantage of less period-to-period variability.

Conclusion The WV model yielded productivity data that correlated closely with values calculated using two validated workload management models. The model may be used as an alternative measure of pharmacy operational productivity.

Copyright ? 2015 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. Add to CiteULikeCiteULike Add to DeliciousDelicious Add to DiggDigg Add to FacebookFacebook Add to Google+Google+ Add to RedditReddit Add to TwitterTwitter What's this?

? Previous | Next Article ? Table of Contents This Article doi: 10.2146/ajhp130803 American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy February 1, 2015 vol. 72 no. 3 206-211 ? Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Classifications Print Content Practice Report Services Email this article to a colleague Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Alert me when eLetters are published Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Download to citation manager eLetters Submit an eLetter No eLetters published Citing Articles Load citing article information Google Scholar Articles by Naseman, R. W. Articles by Kipp, K. M. PubMed PubMed citation Articles by Naseman, R. W. Articles by Kipp, K. M. Related Content Load related web page information Social Bookmarking Add to CiteULikeCiteULike Add to DeliciousDelicious Add to DiggDigg Add to FacebookFacebook Add to Google+Google+ Add to RedditReddit Add to TwitterTwitter What's this?

Current Issue February 15, 2015, 72 (4) Current Issue Alert me to new issues of American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy From the Cover RhOD immune globulin products for prevention of alloimmunization during pregnancy Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to oral administration for solid organ transplant recipients Economic burden of recurrent venous thromboembolism: Analysis from a U.S. hospital perspective Comparative analytics of infusion pump data across multiple hospital systems ABOUT AJHP SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR AUTHORS/REVIEWERS PERMISSION REQUESTS ADVERTISING EMAIL ALERTS (FREE) Email Alerts (Free) RSS FEEDS (FREE) RSS Feeds (Free) HELP CONTACT US/FEEDBACK American Society of Health System Pharmacists Learning Center (CE) Store Meetings & Conferences ASHP Foundation MOST READ ARTICLES (Last 30 Days) Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: A consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists How to write a patient case report Treatment of poisoning caused by {beta}-adrenergic and calcium-channel blockers ? View all Most Read articles Advertisement ? 2015 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Terms of Use | Copyright Online ISSN: 1535-2900 Print ISSN: 1079-2082

View the original article here

0 comments